|
||
|
'.those
waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding, or
growth to maturity.” Over 50 federally managed species
of fish and crustaceans utilize, to varying degrees, the platform substrate for feeding,
spawning, mating, and growing to maturity. Again, platforms are not considered in any of
their FMPs.
Introduction The offshore platforms are obviously EFH/HACP. If the platforms were recognized as protected habitat,
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) would have to recommend to Minerals Management
Service (MMS) to not remove the platforms or take actions to mitigate the loss of habitat.
|
Essential Fish Habitat | Endangered Species Habitat | Federally Managed Species | Coral Habitat | Live Rock | Schooling Fish | Attraction vs. Production
![]()
Essential Fish Habitat
and Protected Habitat Designations for Oil and Gas Platforms EFH/HACP Background Information Regulatory guidelines outlined in the
Magnuson-Stevens Act advises federal agencies to protect coral and essential fish
habitat (EFH/HACP). The Gulf of Mexico Fisheries Management Council (GMFMC) is the
responsible federal agency assigned with the task of evaluating and designating protected
species and essential fish habitat (EFH/HACP). EFH/HACP Federal Action Removal of a platform requires a federal
permit (30
CFR 250.112). EFH/HACP provisions only govern actions by
Federal agencies. If the platforms were considered protected habitat, this
requirement makes their removal subject to NMFS review. That is not to say that a manmade
substrate that is EFH/HACP can't be removed, only that removal can't be accomplished until NMFS
has evaluated the action and determined the need for appropriate mitigative measures (i.e.
impact avoidance, minimization, compensation).
Regulatory Mandate for Coral Coral and Live Rock
organisms in the Gulf has
long been federally protected under the Magnuson-Stevens Act and implemented through 50
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 622. The
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) has authority under the Magnusen-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act to manage coral resources. GMFMC then completed a
fishery management plan (FMP) in 1982. That
FMP prohibited the take of stony corals and sea fans but allowed limited commercial
harvest of soft corals (gorgonians). Regulatory Mandate In 1996, the Magnuson-Stevens Act was
re-authorized and changed by amendments to emphasize the sustainability of the
nations fisheries and establish a new standard by requiring that fisheries be
managed at maximum sustainable levels and that new approaches be taken in habitat
conservation. EFH/HACP is
added to fishery management plans (FMPs) via the Gulf Councils amendment process. EFH is broadly defined by the Act to
include those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding,
feeding, or growth to maturity. This language is interpreted or described in the
1997 Interim Final Rule [62 Fed. Reg. 66551, Section 600.10 Definitions] -- Waters include
aquatic areas and their associated physical, chemical, and biological properties that are
used by fish and may include historic areas if appropriate; substrate includes sediment,
hard bottom, structures underlying the waters, and associated biological communities;
necessary means the habitat required to support a sustainable fishery and the managed
species contribution to a healthy ecosystem; and spawning, breeding, feeding,
or growth to maturity covers a species full life cycle. Conclusion The MMS requires a federal action (30 CFR 250.112) to remove oil and gas platforms. If offshore platforms receive a federally managed status, then GMFMC and NMFS will have to advise the MMS that the platforms should not be removed or some mitigative action be taken to replace the loss of habitat. If a wide range of platforms received protected status, numerous abandonment and shut-down options would become available to the Gulf offshore oil and gas industry. |